Skip to main content

The Trinity/Binity, Part 5: They Are Neither Trinitarians Nor Binitarians

God Is Neither Trinitarian Nor Binitarian

Jehovah God himself never once claimed to be a "Trinity" or "3 persons with 1 substance." He never claimed that he would become a man. He never called Jesus "God" and he never claimed to be the same as his Son. What did God say? "Jehovah your God is One Jehovah!" I see only one God mentioned there, named "Jehovah" and he is reinforcing it by saying that there is only "One Jehovah", as opposed to a pantheon or Trinity. It does not take a special person to "see the Trinity" in what he says, but it takes someone reading more into the Scripture than what is there to do so.

When God spoke of himself in the Hebrew Scriptures (Old Testament), he spoke of himself with the singular pronouns "I" and "me", never "us" and "we" when speaking of himself alone. For example, he said, "I am Jehovah — there is no other." (Joe 2:27 [pa|in]) If God were a Trinity, that would not make sense at all.

Jesus Is Neither Trinitarian Nor Binitarian

Jesus did not say that we have to believe in a Trinity to get salvation. He did not say that God is 3 persons in 1 substance. He certainly did not coin the term "Trinity", and then there is this one glaring point that Trinitarians cannot get around: Jesus never once claimed to be God. Nor did he claim to be a third part of God nor equal to the Father. Jesus himself worshipped God. He said, "I am ascending to my Father and your Father and to my God and your God." (Joh 20:17 [pa|in]) He even provided worship to the Father, not holy spirit, saying, "I publicly praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth." (Mt 11:25 [pa|in])

In fact, he directed all godly worship to the Father, never to himself. He said, "Nevertheless, the hour is coming, and it is now, when the true worshippers will worship the Father [Not the Son,] with spirit and truth, for indeed, the Father [Not the Son,] is looking for ones like these to worship him. God is a Spirit, and those worshipping him must worship with spirit and truth." (Joh 4;23, 24 [pa|in]) When he provided the model prayer, what did he say? "You must pray, then, this way: ’Our Father . . . ’" (Mt 6:9 [pa|in]) When Satan tempted him, what did he do? He quoted Deuteronomy 6:13 [pa|in], changing "fear" to "worship", as appropriate to the circumstances, when he said, "It is Jehovah your God you must worship, and it is to him alone you must render sacred service." (Mt 4:10 [pa|in]; Compare De 10:20 [pa|in])

Since the apostles were adopted sons, Jesus is here making clear that he is no more God than his disciples and God is no less their Father than he is Jesus’ Father. Or are we to believe that they became part of a ’Panity" (All holy ones becoming God)? In fact, Jesus said, "This means everlasting life, their coming to know you, the only true God, and the one whom you sent, Jesus Christ." (Joh 17:3 [pa|in]) He did not say "we are the only true God", or "You and me" or "me, myself and I" or simply "me" or "you the only true God, who is the Father and Son." No, but he said, "you," (meaning not himself,) "the only true God".

Jesus’ Disciples Were Neither Trinitarians Nor Binitarians

John the Baptist said, "And I have seen it, and I have given witness that this one is the Son of God." (Not God himself; Joh 1:34 [pa|in]) Andrew said, "We have found the Messiah." (Not "God"; Joh 1:41 [pa|in]) Simon Peter said, "You are the Christ, the Son of the living God." (Mt 16:16 [pa|in]) Philip said, "We have found the one of whom Moses, in the Law, and the Prophets wrote: Jesus, the son of Joseph, from Nazareth." (Joh 1:45 [pa|in]; see Ge 3:15 [pa|in], 22:18 [pa|in] and De 18:15 [pa|in]) Nathanael Bartholomew said, "Rabbi, you are the Son of God, you are King of Israel." (Joh 1:49 [pa|in]) Martha said, "Yes, Lord, I have believed that you are the Christ, the Son of God, the one coming into the world." (Joh 11:27 [pa|in]) Peter and John together taught that Jesus was "a prophet", God’s "Servant". (Ac 3:26 [pa|in]; compare Isa 42:1 [pa|in]) Barnabas, Paul and the first century Governing body wrote: "men who have given up their lives for the name of our Lord Jesus Christ." (Ac 12:26 [pa|in]) Stephen, the martyr, said, "Look! I see the heavens opened up and the Son of man standing at God’s right hand." (Ac 7:56 [pa|in]) John Mark said, "The beginning of the good news about Jesus Christ, the Son of God." (Mr 1:1 [pa|in]) Paul wrote: "there is actually to us one God, the Father," (1Co 8:6 [pa|in]) Jesus’ own brother, James, said, "a slave of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ." (Jas 1:1 [pa|in]) Near the end of his life, John wrote: "No one has seen God at any time." Meaning "ever". He continued: " . . . Whoever acknowledges that Jesus is God’s Son, God remains in union with such one and he in union with God. . . . But we know that the Son of God has come, and he has given us insight so that we may gain the knowledge of the one who is true. . . . This is the true God and life everlasting." (1 Joh 4:12 [pa|in], 15 [pa|in]; 5:20 [pa|in]; see the subheading, DOES 1 JOHN 5:20 PROVE THAT JESUS IS GOD? in Part 12 [5].) Not one of these claimed nor implied that Jesus is God. (As to the apostle Thomas, see the subheading, DOES JOHN 20:28 PROVE THAT JESUS IS GOD? in`Part 12 [4].)

If they believed that God was a plurality, they would have referred to him with plural pronouns such as "they", "theirs" and the plural form of "you" ("you all"). Instead, they refer to God only with singular pronouns, such as when Paul again said, "one God and Father of all, who is over all and through all and in all." (Eph 4:6 [pa|in])

Pre-Christian Servants of God Were Neither Trinitarians Nor Binitarians

To the Jews, Jehovah was a personal God, not an abstraction like the Trinity, allowing them to have a personal relationship with the One Creator. They were not burdened by a philosophical abstraction to which it is difficult to have a personal relationship. Many people in the Bible had a very deep personal relationship with only one being that they knew as "Jehovah". King David wrote, "May people know that you, whose name is Jehovah, You alone are the Most High over all the earth." (Ps 83:18 [pa|in])

If they believed that God was a plurality, they would have referred to him with plural pronouns such as "they", "theirs" and the plural form of "you" ("you all"). Instead, they refer to God only with singular pronouns, such as "But you, O Jehovah, are a shield around me, my glory and the One who lifts up my head." (Ps 3:3 [pa|in])


Return to the beginning of the Salvation vs. the Trinity/Binity series

Go back to: Part 4: How the Trinity/Binity Affects the Salvation Message

Go to Part 6: Non-modalist Non-tritheism or Tri-modalism?

Comments

Popular Posts

Non-Thinking, Part 3: Counterfeit Christianity Has Served a Purpose

Has the division of Christianity into many apostate sects teaching different salvation messages served a useful purpose to God and Christ? According to the Scriptures, it has served a very specific and useful purpose. Apostate Christianity has assisted in preparing the world for true Christianity to flourish. ( Ro 3:7, 8   [ pa | in ] ;  2Th 2:3   [ pa | in ] ;  2Ti 4:1-5   [ pa | in ] ) How so? Belief in the Christ has been spread throughout the earth while true Christianity was not even in the world and then Christ could bring back true Christianity and do away with those who teach a false salvation message at the end, just as the apostate Jewish system gave way to Christianity. ( Joh 3:19-21   [ pa | in ] ;  Ro 11:7-12   [ pa | in ] ;  2Th 2:6-8   [ pa | in ] ) This has allowed Jehovah to save many more people than if he had founded the Christian congregation for the first time at the end of the system of things or if he tried to ma...

Non-Thinking, Part 1: Do Not Be Afraid

People often hold to ideas that they have grown accustomed to or are invested in. It can be comforting to seek to reinforce ideas we have become attached to and it is because of such things that we can end up deceiving ourselves or allowing others to deceive us. To be able to think freely we must be willing to slaughter our sacred cows instead of clinging to what is familiar or "safe". This does not mean to openly dissent of differing ideas or to go off and form a new religion, but to make your choice about which system to follow without relying upon what is familiar, but on what is truthful and factually reliant upon the Scriptures.  When discussing whether the Trinity, hellfire, the immortality of the soul, or any other significant doctrine is true or not, the most important question is “Why does it matter?” It matters on account of a fundamental difference in the salvation message. Could a map of fire exits help anyone escape if all the exits shown on the map are in th...

The Trinity/Binity, Part 6 (1): Non-modalist Non-tritheism or Tri-modalism?

Many Athenasian Trinitarians try to claim that their belief is not "modalism" by narrowly defining the modalist view as what is actually the more specific Sabellian Modalism as ’God represented through three identities at separate times ’ in order to dissemble and weaken the claim. (This dissembling is not usually purposeful, but is the result of seminary indoctrination.) However, modalism does not actually require that he represents himself at 3 different times. Only Sabellian Modalism has that requirement. Just because the Sabellian form of modalism is the first does not make it the only form. Saying that God is 3 co-equal personages in one substance does nothing to distinguish the Trinity from modalism, but adds a tritheistic element that fogs up the issue. What is rather clumsily labeled "non-modal non-tritheistic" is actually just a merging of modalism and tritheism into what has been dubbed "tri-modalism" by some. The tritheism aspect is to say t...